8 Responses to RT says Syrian rebels plan chem attack on Israel from Assad-controlled territories: situation dangerous, volatile

  1. Dennis E. says:

    Well! I think the entire world likes the idea of The Russians or The U.N. taking international control of Assad’s chemical weapons. Almost too good to be true.Looks like that there could be no US strike and Congress may not even vote.Well, that upsets somebodies plan to destroy Israel.

    I have no doubts that The Rebels have possession of Chemical Weapons and the means to deliver. With tongue in cheek, I will say that somebody could fire a Chemical Weapon from Syria into Israel, and that would change the entire picture in a day. This is not over. Iran may intervene.The Muslims are awaiting for the appearance of their messiah and believe that through war, even the destruction of Israel will enhance his appearance. It is my understanding, and I may be wrong, but I understood the interview between Charlie Rose and President Assad that The Muslim Brotherhood was one of the groups attempting to over throw Assad and I ponder if this administration is behind it. Remember Egypt.

    Also, we should be aware that reports are surfacing that through Latin American Countries, Iran
    is allegedly recruiting terrorist to enter the USA from through its southern border.

    A lot going on here…….

    Like

  2. maria says:

    As Bruce Thornton recently put it in a FrontPage Magazine article:

    All this rhetoric about “crimes against humanity” and the “responsibility to protect” reeks of hypocrisy and moral preening. The President said, “We cannot accept a world where women and children and innocent civilians are gassed on a terrible scale.” Who’s he kidding? We already have, in Hussein’s Iraq. Change “gassed” to “bombed,” “fire-bombed,” “hacked to death,” “machine-gunned,” and “starved” and you can cover the globe with the victims whose deaths on a “terrible scale” we have “accepted.” We have stood by and watched millions of women, children, and innocent civilians murdered in all sorts of ways equally as, or more gruesome and painful than, dying by poison gas.

    In Rwanda anywhere from 500,000 to 1,000,000 men, women, and children were slaughtered in 1994, many by being hacked to death with machetes, not to mention the women raped, purposely infected with HIV, and sexually mutilated. We did nothing to stop the killing not because we militarily couldn’t, but because it was not in our national interests and security to do so. Hence we sent in a toothless U.N. to salve our consciences and deflect the charge of callous inactivity.

    So all those calling for intervention in Syria or anywhere else to prevent “crimes against humanity” should be required to explain just how this unfortunately common slaughter is different from all those others we did not intervene to stop.

    Like

  3. Angelsong says:

    These are perilous times, and waiting upon the Lord is paramount. We are here at the eve of the 9/11 anniversary and it appears that nothing is off the table. I pray we will all seek God’s face and listen when He whispers our name to hear His wisdom. Let us pray for our leaders, our enemies, and offer forgiveness where we have been wronged. You cannot go wrong if your heart is right with the Lord…

    Like

  4. Irene C says:

    So Russia wants Assad to relinquish the gas. Assad had previously said he didn’t have any gas. Assad agreed to turn over the gas – which he said he didn’t have. Ouch!! I think I pulled a muscle in my brain.

    Like

  5. Dennis E. says:

    Although most Americans are against and I be one, a strike on Syria, it seems that somewhere
    down the road, The President is going to do it, regardless of public opinion.
    Also, reports on the internet are surfacing regarding the increased attacks on Christians in Syria by Islamic groups seeking Assad’s over throw. The reports say that houses/churches are being burned in some areas and Christians murdered.
    I am not convinced fully that Assad did this. I am not excusing his previous actions, but I can accept him far better than the groups who are seeking his over throw. We have accepted and tolerated other leaders just as evil. Remember also, this is Russia’s only warm water port in that region and do regard the recent gas and oil discoveries in that area with a new one in Southern Israel.
    Also, also, suppose Syria was to give up its Chemical Weapons to UN Control.
    Would then the world want Israel to give up is alleged nuclear weapons in a guarantee for peace and security? Because one of the reasons Syria has Chemical weapons and Iran seeking Nuclear Weapons and the Saudi’s is because Israel has them. Without these weapons, it would take
    an intervention from Heaven to protect them from total extinction in that part of the world.

    In my opinion, this effort is not over, it is just simmering………….
    09.11.01——-lest we never forget……….

    Like

  6. There is not the legal US Administration or Israeli one that plan the strategy for the conflicts in the Middle East. It is Rothschild’s Group trying to remain and act in shadow. Once the community point to that cause, Rothschild will change the tactic, as now exposing possible rebels to execute that, withdrawing his mercenaries, giving to Israel the cause to respond to the attack, but on Syrian territory.

    Like

  7. niebo says:

    Hey, Dennis E! Echo that — this is a mess, like chewing gum in your hair. Seems like, of all the nations involved, “we” have an agenda of our own:

    http://whowhatwhy.com/2013/08/31/classic-why-real-reason-for-syria-war-plans-from-gen-wesley-clark/

    The best hope for Christians in Syria is for Assad to remain in power, because they are allied with him and his people (Alawites, not Muslims . . . not in the traditional sense, at least):

    http://www.maozisrael.org/site/News2?id=9174

    And, he was winning against the rebels. . . so why use chemical weapons?

    http://www.globalresearch.ca/why-syria-will-not-fall-crushing-defeat-of-free-syrian-army/32490

    Like

All comments are moderated. We reserve the right not to post any comment deemed defamatory, inappropriate, or spam.