12 Responses to Cold War 2.0: Russia tests fires new intercontinental ballistic missile

  1. Ron says:

    I think that most people don’t realize just how close we all are to WWIII.

    Like

  2. Melissa says:

    If things are so tense, why in the world are we welcoming troops to train here in Colorado at Ft. Carson? I’m sure the whole thing was set up before things got extra tense, but why continue the training exercise with troops on US soil if we’re so concerned about this? Something’s amiss.

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/05/17/us-russian-soldiers-train_n_1525502.html

    http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/31024520/detail.html

    Like

  3. Dave says:

    Asking a Foe to do troop exchanges is nothing new, in the late 1930s Germany had troops in UK and UK had troops in Germany, always seems to go on just before World War’s break out, as a person said on here people dont seem to understand just how close WW3 is today.

    Like

  4. Dennis E. says:

    Hmm. The Russians showing off a new toy(it is not really a toy) and it is a mobile launcher. I bet it has a single warhead. As large as the land mass of Russia is, they can hide these anywhere and take them to a preset launch point(s) to shoot. No way the us could respond to this unless it was a laser shot from an obital satellite I suppose.

    Hm! Note that this intercontinental missile(that means it can shoot from Russia to USA or to Europe) HAS THE CAPABILITIES TO OVERCOME ANTI-MISSILE DEFENSES.
    How so? Will it carry its own anti-missile missiles? Will it carry radar jamming equipment?
    Or will it have the ability to sense and evade in coming missiles? Which to me means the warhead section could have either have small thruster maneuver rockets or a small propulsion unit.
    The Russians are upset about the NATO missile defense shield.
    Interesting………….

    Like

  5. TexasRedNeck says:

    The Russians are upset because they lost their empire.

    Like

  6. buff24seven says:

    last time i checked Russia was no longer in debt and there not trying to rule the world like we are neither.

    Like

  7. Joseph t. Repas says:

    Excuse me buff24seven; who was at war in Aghanistan just before the USA ? Though the Berlin wall was torn down it did not stop Russia from using strong arm tacticts with other Eastern Europe nations and they are very involved with the Syrian violence currently happening.

    Like

  8. ONTHEMARK55 says:

    The Soviet Union(not Russia) lived by the sword and died by the sword. The United States of America is living by the sword and?????????????????(outcome pending)

    Like

All comments are moderated. We reserve the right not to post any comment deemed defamatory, inappropriate, or spam.